Break-fix support — you call a technician when something breaks and pay by the hour — looks cheaper because there is no monthly bill. Managed IT costs a fixed monthly fee per user that covers support, monitoring, patching, and backups whether anything breaks or not. For a business that depends on its systems, break-fix usually ends up costing more, because the hourly invoice leaves out the expensive part: the downtime while you wait for the technician, the incidents nobody was paid to prevent, and the fact that no one is accountable for the whole. That said, break-fix is genuinely the right choice for some very small operations — we'll say exactly which ones below.
Break-fix is reactive by definition. Nothing happens until something fails; then you call, wait for availability, and pay for the hours the fix takes. Between incidents, nobody is watching your systems, applying updates, or checking that your backups actually restore. The model has existed forever because it is simple and feels fair: no problems, no bill.
Managed IT flips the arrangement. You pay a flat fee per user per month, and in exchange a provider runs your technology continuously: a helpdesk with agreed response times, monitoring that catches failing disks and stalled backups before they become outages, patches applied on schedule, and backups that get tested with real restores. The provider absorbs the cost of incidents, which changes who wants to prevent them.
The visible comparison is easy. Under break-fix you pay an hourly rate only when something fails, so a quiet month costs nothing and a bad month costs a lot. Under managed IT, a 20-person company paying per-user rates knows its number in advance — the same figure every month, scaling only when the team grows. The visible math favors break-fix in quiet months and managed IT in bad ones, which is exactly why the visible math is not the real comparison.
| Break-fix | Managed IT | |
|---|---|---|
| You pay | By the hour, when something breaks | A fixed monthly fee per user |
| Provider's incentive | More failures, more billing | Fewer failures — incidents cost them time |
| Prevention | None — nobody is paid to prevent | Patching, monitoring, and tested backups included |
| Response time | Whenever the technician is free | Agreed in writing, by severity |
| Budget | Zero in quiet months, spikes in bad ones | Predictable, scales with headcount |
| Accountability | No contract, no SLA | A service agreement you can hold up |
Honestly: if you're a team of two to five people working in cloud tools, with no server or office network of your own, no compliance requirements from clients, and the ability to shrug off a day offline, a monthly managed contract is prevention you may not need — and paying for it would be its own hidden cost. Keep a good technician's number and carry on.
The calculus flips when any of these arrive: you approach ten or more users, deals or deadlines start depending on your systems, you handle data a client would care about, or the first security questionnaire lands in your inbox. From that point, every month of break-fix is deferred cost, not saved cost.
Our managed IT plans run from $99–115 per user per month for the essentials — helpdesk, monitoring, updates, backups — up to $189–220 for the top tier with compliance support and vCIO guidance; every range is published on our pricing page so you can do the math for your team before ever talking to us. If you're not sure which side of the line your business is on, our free self-diagnosis takes a few minutes and gives you a straight answer.
There's no universal number, but the pattern is consistent: around ten users, the cost of interruptions and the volume of routine IT work both reach a point where a flat monthly fee beats paying by the failure. Dependence matters as much as headcount — a seven-person company that bills through its systems every day crosses the line earlier than a fifteen-person company that could work off paper for a week.
Often, yes. Co-managed arrangements exist precisely for this: the provider takes on monitoring, patching, backups, and security — the continuous work — while your trusted person keeps handling day-to-day requests. What matters is that prevention has an owner with a contract, not that any one person is replaced.
Because per-incident pricing recreates the break-fix problem: it rewards the provider for your failures. Per-user pricing ties the provider's revenue to the size of your team, not the frequency of your problems, so the only way they protect their margin is by keeping your systems healthy. It also makes budgeting trivial: users times rate, every month.